Following last night’s exploit of the Nomad Bridge, Chainalysis estimates that $2 billion in cryptocurrency has been stolen from cross-chain bridges across 13 separate hacks so far this year. Attacks on cross-chain bridges account for 69% of total funds stolen so far this year.
This represents a significant threat to building trust in blockchain technology. As more value flows through cross-chain bridges, they become more attractive victims for hackers. Even more troubling is that bridges are now a top target for North Korean-linked hackers, who – according to our estimates – have stolen approximately $1 billion worth of cryptocurrency so far this year, entirely from bridges and other DeFi protocols. For perspective, South Korea’s government-run statistical agency estimates the country earned $89 million from official exports in 2020.
The good news is that these services can take steps to protect themselves. And in the event of a hack, they can leverage the transparency of blockchain technology to investigate the flow of funds and ideally prevent attackers from cashing out their ill-gotten gains.
What are cross-chain bridge protocols?
Cross-chain bridges are designed to solve the challenge of interoperability between different blockchains. A cross-chain bridge is a protocol that lets a user port assets from one blockchain to another. For example, Wormhole is a cross-chain bridging protocol that allows users to move cryptocurrencies and NFTs between the various smart contract blockchains such as Solana and Ethereum.
While bridge designs vary, users typically interact with cross-chain bridges by sending funds in one asset to the bridge protocol, where those funds are then locked into the contract. The user is then issued equivalent funds of a parallel asset on the chain the protocol bridges to. In the case of Wormhole, users typically send Ether (ETH) to the protocol, where it is held as collateral, and are issued Wormhole-wrapped ETH on Solana, backed by that collateral locked in the Wormhole contract on Ethereum.
What makes cross-chain bridges so vulnerable?
Bridges are an attractive target because they often feature a central storage point of funds that back the “bridged” assets on the receiving blockchain. Regardless of how those funds are stored – locked up in a smart contract or with a centralized custodian – that storage point becomes a target. Additionally, effective bridge design is still an unresolved technical challenge, with many new models being developed and tested. These varying designs present novel attack vectors that may be exploited by bad actors as best practices are refined over time.
What can the industry do?
Just a few years ago, centralized exchanges were by far the most frequent targets of hacks in the industry. Today, successful hacks of centralized exchanges are rare. That’s because these organizations prioritized their security, and because hackers are always looking for the newest and most vulnerable services to attack.
While not foolproof, a valuable first step towards addressing issues like this could be for extremely rigorous code audits to become the gold standard of DeFi, both for those building protocols and for the investors evaluating them. Over time, the strongest, safest smart contracts can serve as templates for developers to build from.
Cryptocurrency services – including but not limited to bridges – should invest in security measures and training. For example, with North Korean-linked hackers in particular, sophisticated social engineering tactics that take advantage of the trusting and carelessness of human nature to gain access to corporate networks has long been a favored attack vector. Teams should be trained on these risks and warning signs.
If a service falls victim to an attack, time is of the essence. Immediately tracing and labeling funds in the Chainalysis platform can make the difference in preventing bad actors from cashing out their ill-gotten gains. We recently launched a Crypto Incident Response, a rapid response retainer service for cryptocurrency businesses and large organizations that are high-risk targets for cyber attacks, to help streamline this process.
We hope that our Crypto Incident Response hotline doesn’t ring. But until vulnerabilities are addressed and hacking slows, we’re here if you need us.